In the age of Facebook reviews, viral posts, and group chats, many veterinarians experience reputational damage not because of poor medicine, but because of careless or emotional online statements made by clients.
Not all negative comments are libel. Clients are legally allowed to express dissatisfaction.
However, there is a clear legal boundary where a statement crosses from opinion into libel under Philippine law.
Below are the essential elements that must be present for a statement to be considered libelous against a veterinarian.
1. There Is an Imputation of a Crime, Vice, or Defect
A statement becomes dangerous when it accuses the veterinarian of:
- A crime
- Illegal or unethical conduct
- Moral or professional wrongdoing
Examples of potentially libelous statements:
- “That vet is a scammer.”
- “They intentionally killed my pet.”
- “That clinic is operating illegally.”
- “They are not real veterinarians.”
2. There Is Publication
The statement is communicated to anyone other than the veterinarian, including:
- Facebook posts or comments
- Google reviews
- Messenger or Viber group chats
- Shared screenshots
Even one third person is enough to satisfy this element.
3. The Veterinarian Is Identifiable
The vet does not need to be named directly.
Identification may be established through:
- Clinic name
- Location
- Photos
- Context that clearly points to a specific veterinarian
If people can reasonably identify who is being referred to, this element is met.
4. There Is Malice
Malice exists when:
- The statement is false
- There is no factual basis
- The intent is to shame, pressure, or damage reputation
- The post is driven by anger, revenge, or coercion
Under Philippine law, malice is presumed once a defamatory statement is shown to be false and publicly made.
5. The Statement Is False
Truth is a complete defense against libel.
Proper documentation such as:
- Medical records
- Consent forms
- Diagnostic results
- Standard treatment protocols
can decisively disprove false accusations.
10 Common Dissatisfying Client Comments That Are NOT Libel
These statements may be unpleasant or unfair, but they are generally not libelous because they express opinion, experience, or dissatisfaction without accusing the vet of a crime or unethical conduct.
- “I am not happy with the service.”
- “The consultation felt rushed.”
- “I think the fees are too expensive.”
- “I didn’t feel comfortable with the clinic environment.”
- “The waiting time was too long.”
- “My pet did not improve after treatment.”
- “I expected better communication from the staff.”
- “The vet was not very warm or friendly.”
- “I don’t think this clinic is for me.”
- “I will not be coming back.”
These may hurt to read, but they are legally protected expressions of opinion.
What Is Not Libel (In General)
A statement is not libelous if it is:
- True
- Clearly an opinion
- Based on personal experience
- Made privately and not publicly
- A fair comment without criminal or unethical accusations
Practical Advice for Veterinarians
- Document everything. Records protect you.
- Avoid online arguments. Emotional responses escalate risk.
- Preserve evidence. Screenshot posts and comments.
- Seek legal advice early. Prevention is cheaper than defense.
- Respond professionally, if necessary. Calm, factual, and brief.
Bottom Line
Not every negative review is libel.
But when a statement is false, public, damaging, and malicious, a veterinarian has legal remedies.
Your license is hard-earned.
Your reputation deserves protection.
Sharing this helps others understand what it really means to be a vet. Like and follow if you’re with us.
