One of the most misunderstood ideas in Philippine veterinary medicine is this:
“Mas probinsya kasi, so mas mababa ang standard.”
That statement is wrong.
Dangerously wrong.
And it has quietly damaged veterinary accountability for decades.
Let’s settle this clearly.
There is only ONE professional standard in the Philippines
Whether you are practicing in:
- Makati
- Quezon City
- Baguio
- Palawan
- Basilan
- Tawi-Tawi
You hold the same PRC veterinary license.
You answer to the same Professional Regulatory Board of Veterinary Medicine.
You are governed by the same Veterinary Practice Act (RA 9268).
There is no such thing in Philippine law as:
- “Metro Manila veterinary license”
- “Provincial veterinary license”
- “Rural vet exemption”
You are either a licensed veterinarian or you are not.
And once licensed, the ethical, legal, and professional duties are national.
What changes is not the standard — it is the setting
This is where many people get confused.
The law does NOT demand that every clinic in the Philippines must have:
- CT scan
- Blood gas analyzer
- ICU ventilator
- 24-hour specialists
What the law demands is something more powerful:
You must act as a reasonably prudent veterinarian would under similar circumstances.
This is where place, time, and available facilities come in.
A vet in Siquijor is not expected to own the same equipment as a vet in BGC.
But that vet in Siquijor is still expected to:
- assess properly
- monitor properly
- Control pain properly
- prevent infection
- handle animals humanely
- inform the owner honestly
- and REFER when a case is beyond capability
You do not get a free pass to guess, gamble, or improvise just because you are in a province.
Referral is part of the standard of care
This is the part many clinics ignore.
If you do not have:
- oxygen
- IV fluids
- bloodwork
- monitoring
- isolation ward
- surgical capability
Then the standard of care shifts to stabilization plus referral.
Not referral as a suggestion.
Referral as a professional obligation.
Failing to refer when you should have is not “diskarte.”
It is negligence.
There is no “provincial discount” on animal life
A dog in Davao has the same right to competent veterinary care as a dog in Makati.
A cat in Sorsogon deserves the same:
- safe anesthesia
- clean surgery
- proper monitoring
- honest diagnosis
as a cat in Ortigas.
Geography does not reduce professional duty.
It only changes how you must fulfill it.
Why this matters
Because the most common excuse after a bad outcome is:
“Eh ganyan naman sa probinsya…”
No.
That argument will never protect you in:
- PRC cases
- civil liability
- criminal complaints
- ethics investigations
The question will always be:
Did you act like a reasonably competent veterinarian would have — given what you had, what you knew, and what you should have done next?
Not:
Did you do what everyone else around you was doing?
The real Philippine standard
The true national standard of care is this:
Do what you are capable of.
Know what you are not capable of.
And never pretend otherwise.
That applies in:
- big hospitals
- small clinics
- mobile practice
- government service
- private practice
Anywhere in the archipelago.
One profession.
One license.
One ethical duty.
Sharing this helps others understand what it really means to be a vet. Like and follow if you’re with us.
